Islamic Law and Digital Evidence: Comparative Perspectives from Bangladesh, Malaysia, and the UAE

Authors

  • Shadeka Jannat International Islamic University Chittagong (IIUC), Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61166/arfa.v4i1.145

Keywords:

Islamic Law, Digital Evidence, Shariah, Comparative Jurisprudence, Bangladesh, Malaysia, UAE.

Abstract

The developments in digital technology has revolutionized the approach of modern judicial systems to collect, authenticate and present evidence. Nowadays, electronic evidence (comprising digital documents, emails, video files, metadata and forensic digital images) is a core part of litigation. Regrettably, there is a great deal of dispute over whether it is in line with the Koran. This research explores the admissibility of digital evidence in Bangladesh, Malaysia and the UAE under Islamic law. This article examines with a comparative and religious legal method some recent constitutional impacts, namely the UAE Cybercrime Law 2021, Malaysia’s Evidence Act 1990 (S. 90A), and Bangladesh’s Evidence (Amendment) Act 2022, discussing adherence to traditional fiqh principles qarīnah (circumstantial evidence), iqrār (confession), bayyinah (proof), and shahādah (testimony). The results indicate that the digital evidence meets these standards of authenticity, justifiable acquisition, certainty and integrity can be Shariah compliant. The Shariah-Compliant Digital Evidence Framework (SCDEF) that the study will proposes is an integration of forensic science and Islamic law to make justice compatible with maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah if it is based on protective factors such as moral purity, justice and factuality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abū Dāwūd, S. ibn al-Ashʿath. (1305 H). Sunan Abī Dāwūd (Vol. 3, Kitāb al-Aqdiyyah, Hadith No. 3582). Delhi: Islamic Academy.

Abū Dāwūd, S. ibn al-Ashʿath. (1305 H). Sunan Abī Dāwūd (Vol. 3, Kitāb al-Aqdiyyah, Hadith No. 3611). Delhi: Islamic Academy.

Al-Bukhārī, M. ibn Ismā‘īl. (1305 H). Sahih al-Bukhārī (Vol. 1, Kitāb al-Shahādāt, Hadith No. 2654). Delhi: Islamic Academy.

Al-Bukhārī, M. ibn Ismā‘īl. (1305 H). Sahih al-Bukhārī (Vol. 2, Kitāb al-Adab [Good Manners and Form], Hadith No. 6094). Delhi: Islamic Academy.

Al-Khatib, M. A. (2023). The Concept of Justice in Islam: A Socio-pragmatic Analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 10(5), 45–66. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48756357

Badawi, S. (2024, April 30). Cybercrime: Reporting, penalties & Safety under Cyber Law in UAE | Emirati Advocate. AK Advocates. https://www.lawyersuae.com/uae-criminal-law-cybercrime/

Bangladesh Evidence (Amendment) Act 2022 (Section 65B). Dhaka: Government of Bangladesh. Evidence (Amendment) Act, 2022: An Expert’s View - Dhaka Law Review

Bangladesh Law Commission. (2022). Evidence (Amendment) Act 2022: Legislative Commentary. Dhaka: Ministry of Law. Evidence (Amendment) Act, 2022

Bardavelidze, Nugzar. (2022). SOME QUESTIONS OF ISLAMIC CRIMINAL LAW. JOURNAL LEGAL METHODS. https://doi.org/10.52340/lm.2021.04

Husain, S., Ayoub, N. P., & Hassmann, M. (2024). Legal pluralism in contemporary societies: Dynamics of interaction between Islamic law and secular civil law. Syariat, 1(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.35335/cfb3wk76

Ibn Qayyim al-Jawzīyah, M. ibn A. B. (1989). al-Ṭuruq al-ḥukmīyah fī al-siyāsah al-sharʻīyah (B. M. ʻUyūn, Ed.; al-Ṭabʻah al-ūlá.). Maktabat Dār al-Bayān. al-Ṭuruq al-ḥukmīyah fī al-siyāsah al-sharʻīyah in SearchWorks catalog

Ibn Rushd. (1995). Bidāyat al-Mujtahid wa Nihāyat al-Muqtaṣid. Cairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth.

Bidāyat al-mujtahid wa-nihāyat al-muqtaṣid by Averroës | Open Library

Imam al-Nawawi. (2019). Sahih Muslim: With full commentary by Imam Al-Nawawi (A. Salahi, Trans.). Adil Salahi. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/15121706

International Review of Law. (2023). E-Justice and the Concept of Testimony in Shariah. https://doi.org/10.5339/irl.2023.15

Ismail, W. a. F. W., Baharuddin, A. S., Mutalib, L. A., & Alias, M. a. A. (2021). An appraisal of digital documents as evidence in Islamic Law. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3), 198. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0076

Kamali, M. H. (1999). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. Cambridge, UK: Islamic Text Society. https://www.muslim-library.com/dl/books/English_Principle_of_Islamic_Jurisprudence.pdf

Mustafa, Abdul-Rahman, On Taqlīd: Ibn al Qayyim’s Critique of Authority in Islamic Law (New York, 2013; online edn, Oxford Academic, 23 May 2013), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937516.001.0001, accessed 15 Oct. 2025.

Nawaz, A. (2017). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence ~ Kamali Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. www.academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/34565882/Principles_of_Islamic_Jurisprudence_Kamali_Principles_of_Islamic_Jurisprudence

Qatar University Journal of Islamic Law Studies. (2022). Digital Evidence and Islamic Law: Challenges and Prospects. https://doi.org/10.5339/qfil.2022.08

Radhakrishna, Gita. (2017). Section 90A Evidence Act 1950 of Malaysia: Time to Review. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313673126_Section_90A_Evidence_Act_1950_of_Malaysia_Time_to_Review

Rakha, N. A. (2024). Cybercrime and the Law: Addressing the challenges of digital forensics in criminal investigations. Mexican Law Review, 23–54. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24485306e.2024.2.18892

Safian, Yasmin. (2016). The Contribution of Yusuf Qaradawi to the Development of Fiqh. Electronic Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-124518

The Qur’an (M.T.U.D. Abdel Haleem, & M.M. Khan, Trans.). 91996). Oxford University Press.

Techlife. (n.d.). Virtual court “MyCourt” launched on web - Techlife.

Tech Life. https://techlife.com.bd/details/virtual-court-%27mycourt%27-launched-on-web

UAE Federal Law No. 2 of 2021 on Cybercrime. Abu Dhabi: Official Gazette of the

United Arab Emirates. https://uaelegislation.gov.ae/en/legislations/1526/download

Zaharuddin, F. (n.d.). [Dr._Wahbah_Az-Zuhaili]_Fiqih_Islam_Wa_Adillatuhu_(b-ok.cc).pdf. Scribd. https://www.scribd.com/document/458749557/Dr-Wahbah-Az-Zuhaili-Fiqih-Islam-Wa-Adillatuhu-b-ok-cc-pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Shadeka Jannat. (2026). Islamic Law and Digital Evidence: Comparative Perspectives from Bangladesh, Malaysia, and the UAE. Al-Arfa: Journal of Sharia, Islamic Economics and Law, 4(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.61166/arfa.v4i1.145

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.